This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 7.6 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. The number of job openings (black) were down 15% year-over-year.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 7.6 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. million in February , the U.S. million and 5.3 million from 7.76
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 7.7 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. million in January , the U.S. Hires held at 5.4
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 9.6 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 6.1 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 20% year-over-year. million and 5.9 million) increased.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 8.1 Over the month, both the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.6 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 19% year-over-year. million and 5.4
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 10.5 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 6.1 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 4% year-over-year. million and 5.9
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings increased to 10.7 The number of hires edged down to 6.1 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. million) edged down.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 10.8 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 6.4 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 6% year-over-year. million and 5.9 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary the number of job openings was little changed at 7.7 The number of total separations was little changed at 5.3 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings edged up to 10.1 Over the month, the number of hires changed little at 6.1 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 10.1 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. The number of job openings (black) were down 5% year-over-year.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 9.8 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 6.2 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 14% year-over-year. million and 5.9 million from 10.3
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 9.0 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.6 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 20% year-over-year. million and 5.4 million from 8.93
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 8.8 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.8 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 11% year-over-year. million and 5.6 million from 8.75
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 8.7 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 5.9 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 17% year-over-year. million and 5.6 million, respectively.
riabiz.com) The Russell 2000 is a flawed index. theverge.com) The number of AI models just keeps growing. wsj.com) Economy The June PCE price index increased 2.5% economy is impressive. ourworldindata.org) A growing number of Americans say they do not plan to have children. year-over-year, down from 2.6%
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 9.9 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 6.2 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 14% year-over-year. million and 5.8 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 8.1 Over the month, both the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.8 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 13% year-over-year. million and 5.4
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 11.2 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. million on the last business day of July, the U.S.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 8.5 Over the month, the number of hires changed little at 5.5 million while the number of total separations decreased to 5.2 This series started in December 2000. million on the last business day of March, the U.S.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was unchanged at 8.2 Over the month, both the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.3 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 10% year-over-year. million and 5.1
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 8.0 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. million on the last business day of August , the U.S.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings increased to 9.6 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 5.9 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 6% year-over-year. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
Meaning, you do not get the 8-10% long-term gains without living through a significant number of market events, ranging from cyclical drawdowns to longer secular bear markets, and full-on crashes. 2000-13 : Secular bear market did not make new highs until March 2013 2018 : ~20% pullback as the economy slowed, FOMC hiked.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 8.8 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations decreased to 5.5 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 18% year-over-year. million and 5.3 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary he number of job openings changed little at 8.9 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 15% year-over-year. million and 5.3 million from 8.89
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings changed little at 9.6 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 5.9 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 12% year-over-year. million and 5.5 million from 9.50
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings increased to 11.0 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 6.2 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 4% year-over-year. million and 5.9 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings edged down to 10.3 Over the month the number of hires and total separations changed little at 6.0 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 7% year-over-year. million and 5.7 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings decreased to 10.7 This series started in December 2000. Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. The number of job openings (black) were up 9% year-over-year.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings edged down to 8.8 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations changed little at 5.8 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 22% year-over-year. million and 5.5 million, respectively.
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary The number of job openings was little changed at 9.6 Over the month, the number of hires and total separations decreased to 5.9 This series started in December 2000. The number of job openings (black) were down 13% year-over-year. million and 5.6 million from 9.62
but the giveback off the highs was substantial: S&P 500 was down ~23%, Russell 2000 was off 27%, and the Nasdaq 100 came down 32%. are fast-growing, highly profitable key players in the modern economy. Some folks who are more familiar with the numbers than I have suggested it will not be pretty. End of ZIRP?
Previously she was co-head of the bank’s Innovation Economy Group. Alright, so, so you go from public finance, how did you evolve towards co-head of innovation economy? So Barry Ritholtz : Let’s talk about your dual role, your, your co-head of innovation economy and your head of specialized industries.
One More Bit of Good News November was a huge month for stocks, but the big winner was small caps, with the Russell 2000 up an amazing 10.9%. Optimism over lower taxes, a stronger economy, animal spirits, and strong earnings all were likely reasons for the surge. For reference, the 2019 average was 166,000.
Good news can be bad news in the short run, but a solid economy usually becomes good news again once we get past the initial market reaction. If the underlying economy is sound, pullbacks like this can actually be a positive for the longer-term health of the market. Monthly numbers can be noisy and so a 3-month average is helpful.
last week, declining for the second consecutive week, but there’s still a lot of strength under the surface, as the small cap Russell 2000 Index climbed 3.5%. March 2000 at the peak of the tech bubble. Q2 GDP Growth Confirms Economic Resilience The economy grew at an annualized pace of 2.8% almost broke the economy in 2019.
“Treasury yields continued to spike last week as markets grappled with illiquidity and concerns that the resilient economy will keep inflation stubbornly high. percent – the highest level since December 2000,” said Joel Kan, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. Added Kan, “The ARM share of applications increased to 7.6
Comparing present day data with data from 2000 through 2019, we clearly see strength in the present. That’s occurred alongside an impressive number of jobs still unfilled. To be sure, the number of unfilled job openings has declined to 9.6 To be sure, the number of unfilled job openings has declined to 9.6
Schroders ) • The Exact Age When You Make Your Best Financial Decisions There’s a magic number for when your expertise and cognitive powers align. economy is doing well, why do so many Americans say it’s terrible? 2000-2003 Dotcom implosion 6. Savings rates have rocketed and UK savers can earn over 5% on deposits.
It’s where tech bubble in 2000 is the classic example. Barry Ritholtz : He had a very famous Wall Street Journal piece In, like, late night fourteenth 2000. I thought of small caps as benefiting from a stronger economy, you see rising rates good for small caps. They had great numbers, not great enough.
For example, if the house brings in $2000 per month ($24,000 each year) and the sale price is $240,000, the next investor is buying a business with a price-to-earnings ratio of 10, because 240k/24k=10. Does it mean our entire economy is expected to grow much more quickly? In the case of the current stock market euphoria, not exactly.
What makes Graham so interesting is while everybody else in the world of private equity is focused on the analytics and crunching numbers and creating econometric models that will tell you where to invest, I think they’ve found a very different model that has been extremely successful for them, where the key focus is on talent.
Let’s Not Get Too Excited Yet Yes, stocks hit new highs across the board last week on optimism about an economy that would likely avoid a recession and a Fed that was now cutting rates. Beyond headline inflation, higher energy prices can even feed into core inflation numbers that the Fed typically focuses on. Matching the 13.9%
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content