This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Baltimore (an old NFL team that was formerly the original Cleveland Browns) won in 2001 and the market dropped. Any investment strategy that does not incorporate your goals, time horizon, and risktolerance is flawed. Approaching retirement and want another opinion on where you stand? Take stock of where you are.
So it was a pretty different situation from 2001, where the whole dot-com bust, but more importantly, the telecom implosion. So you retire in 2018. And the main one is that it used to be that hedge funds were populated with risk-tolerant investors. But it was not a liquidity issue. ’08 RITHOLTZ: Really interesting.
And then I was the beneficiary of the TMT bubble bursting in 2001. They have a different liability structure, different investment goals, different investment risktolerances, and we have different teams. I ended up being hired onto the high yield desk as a research analyst and did that for a number of years, a couple of years.
This is a helpful starting place, but the right answer for you will vary based on factors specific to you—your age, risktolerance, other assets, spending level, life expectancy, etc. Another way to look at it is not in terms of a recommended maximum percentage but in terms of the downside risk you’re willing to take on.
Plus, if your home prices appreciate dramatically, hey that’s great for your retirement. And I think also because people are living longer and, you know, staying in jobs longer, taking longer to retire, there isn’t maybe as up as much upward mobility as there used to be. And they feel like that’s happening.
Not only were they late to start tightening in, in 2001, they they 2021, they were late to recognize inflation peaked in 22. ’cause they sort of feel like, you know, we can wait a little bit longer and the risk that we’re taking is very slow because look at how strong the US labor market is. Try, try that.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content