This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There are about 13 different portfolio managers each focused on a different sub-sector. They run long short across each of these, and they’ve put up some pretty impressive numbers over the past couple of years. 00:06:36 [Speaker Changed] So in, in 2004, I joined Morgan Stanley equity research. That was great.
Graham Foster] : 00:02:54 That was a number, that was number theory, pure number theory. And whether it’s all numbers or even numbers. Some people look at a casino as entertainment and hey, we’re gonna spend X dollars, pick a number, 500, 2000, whatever it is. Number one, longevity.
.” It’s really helpful to have had five other meetings with people who sit at analogous funds that had losses that were just as big, and in fact, they may have contributed to those losses more and be able to tell him, first off, your fund, just by my math, has a $250 million management fee. These are big numbers.
Probably somewhere around 2004 or ‘05, we started doing things by ourselves. So when I looked at the world of higher rates, does it have a big impact on how you structure deals, or is it just a factor that’s going to move up and down and everybody just changes their spreadsheets and the numbers all just move higher?
They are a multi-manager, multi-strategy hedge fund that has put up some pretty impressive numbers. You had an argument that why you’d have an edge because you knew these managers and these stocks deeply and that’s really was like a Cambrian explosion of hedge funds at at that moment in time. Half is a giant number.
And I was kind of intrigued and so I said, can we discuss it, and he laid it out on a conference table and I said, what’s this number? And then I said, what’s this number down here, and he said, this is last year’s earnings. And that number was $160 million. BROWDER: I just gone the riskmanagement committee.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content