This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Back in 2004, there were very few bloggers, it was a new thing. My blog was the Forbes blog of the year for 2004 in less than three full months of blogging which should tell you how thin it was back then. The way that number went up though, I don't know if it was a real number or not. I mentioned Seeking Alpha above.
Mutiny makes a point that I've been writing about and have embedded into my process since 2004. There are expectations embedded in these numbers. They are not intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation. There's all sorts of information here.
While no significant decreases in charitable giving were found, CCS did find that “in more recent presidential election years, it appears that political giving is making up an increasingly larger percentage of all giving during the months surrounding the election, hovering around 12% in the fall of 2016 compared to around 8% in the fall of 2004.”
So, you start the blog in 2004, more or less. And they do that for 35 years tweaking numbers I go you won, you won the game. Number one, everybody has credit cards, everybody misunderstands how to use them, and there are actually some secret perks that people have no idea about. SETHI: Yes, number one is eating out or dining.
The problem: I didn’t have anywhere near $400,000 sitting in my checking account, and I did not want to sell a bunch of shares and trigger capital gains taxes (which in my case would be at least $60,000), just for this short term project. This avoids triggering unnecessary capital gains taxes. I’m a good friend, but not that good.
00:17:50 You wanna know why Dara reported for Uber that again, their number of employees was down quarter of over quarter. It’s 10 blue links, but it’s an infinite number of blue links. So remember data and data infrastructure, that is the number one primitive to ai. Sales centers are, are more productive.
The bank has periodically improved quarterly numbers while maintaining an impressive dividend yield of 1.17%. The bank engaged in capital market services, foreign currency and derivatives, cross-border commerce, correspondent banking services, and tax collection. HDFC Bank controls 47% of the POS and e-commerce platform sector.
We have a number of reasons for our renewed comfort level: Improving economy: The weakness of Europe’s macroeconomic outlook in recent years was one of the primary red flags we saw for European stocks. stocks since the middle of 2004. But it is a meaningful change worthy of discussion after a long period of time. is much clearer.
We have a number of reasons for our renewed comfort level: Improving economy: The weakness of Europe’s macroeconomic outlook in recent years was one of the primary red flags we saw for European stocks. stocks since the middle of 2004. But it is a meaningful change worthy of discussion after a long period of time. is much clearer.
And they kept it there all the way to 2004, and the joke was in 2003 and 2004 was an emergency rate when there was no clear emergency. And you’re right, the first example of emergency policy was after 9/11, when they cut rates down to the unfathomable level back then, of around 1%. Can you beat the course? Jim Bianco : Yes.
He began as an attorney working on things like taxes and, and trusts in estates and consulting for various RIA firms when he became an RIA and eventually bought creative planning when it had, you know, a handful of, of clients and, you know, 30, $35 million. What led you to acquire the company in 2004? That was back in 1983.
If congress does nothing, then starting in 2034 incoming payroll taxes would cover 80% of retiree payouts implying a 20% cut. Cutting benefits and raising taxes are the two most talked about way to fix it. There's been talk of raising the cap on payroll taxes. More taxes on workers? Nearly half of U.S. FRA of 72?
So there are a number of us heading in out of college into the BLS. And actually, I was at the PPI, most people may not remember this, but in 2004, the PPI was a month and a half late. And you could look around and find Munis running a tax equivalent — NORTON: That’s right. I was on the Producer Price Index.
There's a lot of neat things about 19+ years of blogging, I started in Sept 2004, including circling back around to ideas that we started talking about a longggggg time ago. They are not intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation.
I mean, I could count them on one hand the number of people who have his depth of knowledge in this space. And so, I was doing that in 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004. I — I couldn’t believe the numbers. RITHOLTZ: So — so they, at one point in time, were the number one fund in a lot of specific categories.
Graham Foster] : 00:02:54 That was a number, that was number theory, pure number theory. And whether it’s all numbers or even numbers. Some people look at a casino as entertainment and hey, we’re gonna spend X dollars, pick a number, 500, 2000, whatever it is. Number one, longevity.
DAMODARAN: I am interested in numbers. I’m naturally a numbers person. To me, storytelling is much more — I mean, if you think about the history of humanity, for thousands of years, the way we pass down information was with stories, not numbers. It has allowed for this acceleration of number crunching.
” ( Barron’s ) • The government numbers are not fake. They’re just noisy : In which David Sacks and Balaji raise a false alarm about the jobs numbers. He cofounded Tikehau in 2004 with Antoine Flamarion, a colleague at Deutsche Bank, and runs the US division. That has obviously been corrected.
And I was kind of intrigued and so I said, can we discuss it, and he laid it out on a conference table and I said, what’s this number? And then I said, what’s this number down here, and he said, this is last year’s earnings. And that number was $160 million. I said, no, that couldn’t be right. RITHOLTZ: Wow.
Many noted how the 2022 midterms came in much closer to expectations and that maybe this time so would the presidential election, but this is yet another election involving President Trump that saw his eventual numbers come in better than expected, similar to 2016 and 2020. gain was the best in exactly two years.
RITHOLTZ: 2004, 2005. Uh, Fred said to give me your number.” ” (LAUGHTER) And he goes, and then he goes like this and tell Fred not to give up my (EXPLETIVE) phone number anymore. LINDZON: Lesson number two. And they go, what’s street.com’s number. How’s my 10 grand doing? I go, maybe.
Friends was a television ratings juggernaut for ten seasons from 1994-2004. Third, sensible investors create portfolios with concern for tax considerations. The principles of equity orientation, diversification, and tax sensitivity find support both in common sense and academic theory.” Of course, it’s a pickup line.
Many noted how the 2022 midterms came in much closer to expectations and that maybe this time so would the presidential election, but this is yet another election involving President Trump that saw his eventual numbers come in better than expected, similar to 2016 and 2020. gain was the best in exactly two years.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content