This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you own 10,000 shares, you receive $40,000 in dividend income (before taxes) and have a portfolio currently worth $2M. You’ll receive the same $40,000 in dividend income and the value of your portfolio drops to $1.5M. Dividend paying stocks and funds can be a great addition to a portfolio.
Different risktolerance and different business plan. And I want to own all of these affordable housing homes that are in the institutional portfolios. BRYANT: And institutions that did not really think this was a sweet spot for their portfolio. BRYANT: Because small business starts stalled in 2004.
In 2004, Jonathan Clements wrote: With the formula that Dalbar uses, stock-fund investors don't earn the full monthly return on any money that they invest during that month. The main culprit for the portfolio gap is cash, which we spoke about with Morgan Housel recently. The fully invested 60/40 portfolio would have done 9.4%
And I think, you know, if you look at the 2004, 2007, eight period, boy, it would’ve been really good if we’d done something about subprime mortgage lending, about mortgage underwriting standards. I said, no, Bob, I don’t think my, my risktolerance is, is, is right for that. Try, try that.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content