This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
So how do you then go from tax and audit practice to finance and investing? So I took it upon myself to go off and took a course in bond math, took another course in derivatives and realized the underlying fundamental concepts were barely, I mean, it wasn’t even high school math in most cases. Very different fields.
We've talked just a couple of times about the market becoming increasingly concentrated which just in terms of math means that a diversified strategy will lag for as long as the big names do well. They are not intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation.
But the numbers you can’t argue with, I mean, we all know that the brutal math of investing before costs investors collectively will earn the market return after costs. So we are talking about things in what I consider personal finance, home ownership, social security, tax management, estate planning and so on. Right, right.
The course covers an introduction to personal finance, credit cards, life insurance, health insurance, investment instruments, loans, income tax and planning, budgeting and building a strong portfolio. Also, you will learn how to plan your taxes, credit score importance and how to budget your income to create a portfolio.
Again just using simple math, this presumes the par value will roll over each month and reinvest at the same rate to get to the annual yield. Consider your objectives Before making an assetallocation decision, always keep in mind what you’re trying to accomplish. Compare that to the stated yield of 5.6% 467% a month.
The webinar talked about the future of model portfolios transitioning from a combo of ETFs for passive and mutual funds for active to include more direct indexing to allow for "tax optimization." Assetallocation matters. So using simple math, the total return is 34% versus 72% for the common. adds another 22.5%
You wouldn’t be surprised to learn the tax consequences of owning a mutual fund is a part of it. I’d say management consulting is any of the other thing that least at that time was the other career trajectory, just my personality, more of a math oriented introvert. Really fascinating guy. So I was at Harvard.
We’d look at the assetallocations of their portfolios and whether they’re tax-deferred, tax-exempt, or taxable. The math is the easy part, but James and Pamela have never really had a conversation on what their dream will look like—or even to what extent they both share it. So—problem solved, right?
00:03:14 [Mike Greene] So that was actually an outgrowth from my experience coming out of Wharton and you mentioned the, the, you know, the transition of people who tended to be skilled at math or physics into finance. People earn wages, whether it’s a retirement account or a tax deferred account or just an investment account.
Math Matters. I did okay in school and was educated on many different topics, including the basic principle that math matters. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision.
One, one is true and I’ve always said is that I wanted people to stop, ask if I could doing math. And no one asked me if I can do math anymore with a degree from Booth, particularly in econometrics and statistics. So people really ask you, you take French and can you do math. It depends on your assetallocation.
I — I loved math, but really, I was going to go down that literature route more than anything else and — and study Spanish literature. there’s a big focus on how do we optimize for tax efficiency, too. It’s different wealth regimes, it’s different tax regimes. RITHOLTZ: Applied Mathematics, Quants, those guys, yeah.
So there’s been a big push for folks to get the appropriate level of assetallocation in a highly diversified, low cost way. Also being cognizant of the tax implications of trading activity. They like tax-free income, but they also don’t like principal losses. It kind of made me think of a question.
Once you have your assetallocation dialed in, your automatic contributions dialed in, all the basics, then you can move on. Have I managed my assetallocation and my investment fees? It’s much deeper than math. And they do that for 35 years tweaking numbers I go you won, you won the game. Am I paid well?
They’re assetallocation model driven folks. 00:28:47 [Speaker Changed] We’re a, we’re running a 10 year Monte Carlo, that’s probably 20,000, 10,000 paths of outcomes on that asset. And I was always good at math and, and I had been writing code since I was in the sixth grade. They cover everything.
I’m kind of in intrigued by the idea of philosophy and math. So I found myself getting kind of bored with my math problem sets, and then I could shift to philosophy and then go back and forth. It’s all tax free. In not paying your taxes. So ba in mathematics and philosophy from Berkeley, an MBA from Columbia.
And I, and I really like the application of math and statistics and computer science to markets. You learn the math that can help you with, with market making operations. It’s just not smart on a math basis to do that. Alternatives and alternative strategies tend to be less tax efficient, more opaque.
Jeffrey Sherman : Well, what it was was, so I, as I said, with applications, there’s many applications of math, and the usually obvious one is physics. Barry Ritholtz : It seems that some people are math people and some people are not. The, the math came easier. And I really hated physics, really. It’s so true.
Or should this be kept out of private assetallocators’ hands? Let’s talk about tax loopholes. How on earth is there still a carried interest tax loophole for private equity, hedge funds, and venture capital? Cut my taxes in half, where do I sign up for that? It’s corporate tax avoidance.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content