This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
(awealthofcommonsense.com) Corey Hoffstein talks with Farouk Jivraj, Portfolio Manager and Head of Alternative Risk Premia at Fidelity Investments’ Asset Management Solutions division. ritholtz.com) Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway talk multi-strategy hedge fund math with Dan Morillo, co-founder of Freestone Grove Partners.
rcmalternatives.com) How skew and kurtosis should play a role in portfolio construction. Skew Why investors avoid positive-skew investment strategies. mailchi.mp) Round-ups A round-up of recent white papers including 'A New Paradigm in Active Equity.'
Economic Innumeracy : Some individuals experience math anxiety, but it only takes a bit of insight to navigate the many ways numbers can mislead us. We evolved in an arithmetic world, so we are unprepared for the exponential math of finance. Cognitive Deficits : You’re human unfortunately, that hurts your portfolio.
Top clicks this week Three assets that don't diversify your portfolio as well as you think. morningstar.com) The problematic math of passing down generational wealth. blogs.cfainstitute.org) International diversification requires a long time horizon. awealthofcommonsense.com) The S&P 500 is now nearly 40% of global market cap.
Retirement planning, then, isn't just about getting the math right to work out between the client's desired spending level and their income and assets available, nor is it about achieving the highest Monte Carlo score. It's about developing a dynamic spending plan (e.g.,
Top clicks this week How Morgan Housel invests his portfolio. aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com) How to make the math behind home ownership work (or not). etf.com) The hardest thing about being an investor is deciding what to focus on. behaviouralinvestment.com) Why selling a stock is harder than buying. morningstar.com)
Home ownership How to make the math behind home ownership work (or not). awealthofcommonsense.com) How Morgan Housel invests his portfolio. morningstar.com) What happened in 1990 to drive real housing prices higher? awealthofcommonsense.com) Some 40% of under-30-year-old home buyers get help from their family.
Whether it’s a few decades or a century, the math works the same. Hey, what a very different outcome than suggesting a loss of purchasing power — if you understand money and math, you have actually gained purchasing power. Instead of cherry-picking the S&P 500, what about a simple 60/40 portfolio (e.g.,
Podcasts Barry Ritholtz talks with Liz Ann Sonders about how to rebalance your portfolio. awealthofcommonsense.com) On the math of a 0% line of credit. ritholtz.com) Jesse Cramer talks with Peter Lazaroff about how to hang in there for the long run. realsmartica.com) Better investors make fewer decisions. Rockefeller.
But suddenly they find themselves sitting on an uncomfortably large percentage of their portfolio in a single name. To help us unpack all of this and what it means for your portfolio Let’s bring in Meb Faber He’s the founder and chief investment officer of Cambria. Perhaps they have some founder stock from a startup.
morningstar.com) The 60/40 portfolio is flawed, but you need an alternative. wealthmanagement.com) The math behind savings rates and retiring early. financialmechanic.com) Concentrated portfolios come with a lot of psychological stress. (abnormalreturns.com) FutureProof announced the first 50 speakers including the musical acts.
At the same time, they also overwhelmingly recognize the value of financial advisors , not only for increasing their wealth beyond what they could have achieved on their own , but also for helping them feel more prepared and less stressed about their finances!
24, 2023 _ 1: In particular, why average outperforms over the long run; Sommers credits not making errors (via Charlie Ellis’ “Winning the Loser’s Game”) but the nuance and math are fascinating. I have dozens of examples of traders who made the right call for some of the above for all the wrong reasons. By Jeff Sommer New York Times, Nov.
Sherman oversees and administers DoubleLine’s investment management subcommittee; serves as lead portfolio manager for multisector and derivative-based strategies; and is a member of the firm’s executive management and fixed-income asset allocation committees. He is host of the podcast The Sherman Show and a CFA charter holder.
His philanthropy includes sitting on the board of directors of Paul Tudor Jones’ Robin Hood Foundation and Jim Simon’s Math for America. That setup plus the mistaken belief that Portfolio Insurance would offer protection from losses, was the perfect up parallel.
Morgan Housel Finance types tend to focus on attributes like intelligence, math skills and computer programming. We’re going to discuss how to make sure your behavior is not getting in the way of your portfolio. How you behave with money matters more than what you know about money. He is the author of “The Psychology of Money.”
First, is the math right based on my numbers? I think it can be a productive portfolio addition betting on the asymmetry which of course argues for starting very small. The above two portfolios are pretty consistent with a lot of the work we do here. How can it solve anyone's problem?
First up was a webinar about model portfolios at ETF.com. Outsourcing the work related to actually being an advisor would not feel right to me and I enjoy what I get to do including portfolio construction. I think that when investors hear about model portfolios they sort of think in terms of set and forget.
Many risks important for our portfolios are new, hidden, or nuanced in some underappreciated way—and likely to be misunderstood and mispriced in the markets. Other risks can hide in plain sight. In short: we need informed creativity, not calculation. Please read the Alpha Architect disclosures at your convenience.
If you do the math, that yields a better long term result in nominal terms and also in risk adjusted terms. Getting that exact result is not going to be easy for too many people but the idea of structuring a portfolio to be less volatile while avoiding interest rate risk is something that someone who is so inclined can do.
barrons.com) Bond math looks a lot different from a year ago, let alone six months. morningstar.com) Just how bad is the drawdown in the 60/40 portfolio this year? Markets T-bill yields are approaching 4%. priceactionlab.com) Apple A look at the new iPhone 14s. daringfireball.net) The Apple ($AAPL) Series 8 Watch is all about health.
A portfolio that goes narrower than an S&P 500 500 or total market fund probably has some exposure to low vol, dividends and the others. And checking in on the GraniteShares YieldBoost SPY ETF (YSPY) that sells put spreads on a levered S&P 500 ETF; Yes, that is a rough start, clearly, but interestingly the math checks out.
These studies show that, given a choice between an annuity with a monthly income and an investment portfolio structured to provide the same sort of returns over time, if we’re near retirement we choose the annuity seven times out of ten. There’s no shame in admitting that factor – for a lot of us, math can be very tough.
My back-to-work morning train WFH reads: • Ken Griffin’s Hand-Picked Math Prodigy Runs Market-Making Empire : Citadel Securities CEO Peng Zhao left for college at age 14, caught Griffin’s eye early in his career and built systems now mopping up market share. TKer ) • The Debt Ceiling Dispute Raises the Risks for ‘Risk-Free’ U.S.
There was an article on LinkedIn (via Abnormal Returns) by Victor Haghani that dug into the math working against leveraged ETFs. In a 60/40 portfolio, a 30% weighting to SSO would in theory equal a 60% weight to equities, opening the door to some sort of of capital efficient portfolio even if that just meant sitting in cash.
If any of us had constructed this portfolio and implemented it for ourselves, it would have been a very acceptable result. The portfolio did just fine, it captured most of the upside and avoided the full brunt in 2022's large decline. One thing lacking from the "Endowment ETF Model Portfolio" is any hint of endowment-like results.
It's been a while since this sort of thing was relevant for my day job so something could have changed, weeklies didn't exist for example, but if my math is correct then it was way over exposed which would account for last week's decline in the fund price. Please leave a comment if I did the work incorrectly.
Make sure your income is coming from a secure source, not the best performing portfolio. Look at the math to understand and believe it. It’s important to have the right strategy in place when it comes to taking out your retirement income.
And then just a little math, the "guarantee" based on the 50/50 allocation would be 2.5% Portfolio 3 with 65% HEQT and 35% SPHB was down quite a bit less than the S&P 500 last year and the standard deviation is noticeably lower too. Keep it to something broad like a total market fund or a market cap weighted large cap index.
Here's a quote I saw attributed to Barry Ritholtz: “The Best Portfolio is probably the one which sacrifices a bit of performance, but helps you sleep at night.” Barry's quote reminded me of another influence on how I try to manage client portfolio volatility and why I use alts (yes, that conversation continues). Cannot be done?
S&P returns (including dividends) since 2019, graph by the excellent portfolio visualizer website. Which makes the landlord business a lot less profitable, and we should expect exactly the same thing as stock investor: lower future profits as a percentage of our portfolio value. Its just basic math.
My Two-for-Tuesday morning train WFH reads: • Stock Pickers Never Had a Chance Against Hard Math of the Market : In years like this one, when just a few big companies outperform, it’s hard to assemble a winning portfolio. Businessweek ) but see With cash earning 5%, why risk money on the stock market?
She has a really fascinating background, very eclectic, a combination of math and law. You, you get a, a BS in Mathematics and a JD from Boston University Math and Law. It is something, math has always come easy to me since a child. I didn’t get an advanced degree in math. Not the usual combination. What happened?
I've been saying meaningful yield without too much volatility is what investors hope the bond portion of their portfolio will give. The simple 40 year trade for bonds of "number go up" is finished and as a matter of math, can't be repeated. Taking volatility out of a fixed income portfolio is fairly simple.
Barron's had a fun article that looked at some ideas from William Bernstein titled The Trick To A Bullet Proof Portfolio? Based on the title, it would seem to be in the neighborhood of creating an all-weather portfolio which we've looked at in several different forms over the course of my full 19 years of blogging.
In my ongoing quest to redefine portfolio construction, I've mentioned labeling asset classes based on their attributes versus just their proper names like growth which could include more than just equities or inflation protected which could include more than just TIPS and so on. We talk frequently about portfolios being relatively simple.
This blog has pretty much evolved into 100 ways to build a portfolio without bonds. The article devoted a good amount of space to bond market math, focusing on the pain of owning the iShares 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TLT) and bond funds in general. If the Fed itself can’t forecast rates, why would your financial advisers think they can?"
Simple math, it looks like the carry index has compounded at less than 3%. If you use the fund in the manner that I think they intend, a blow up for the stocks and managed futures ETF would be a setback for a portfolio but not a catastrophe. The red line for T-bills is price only. And why do you think you need the leverage?
But today, data is widely available and it’s a key tool you can use to enhance your portfolio returns. Portfolio management was a lot less evidence-based than it is today. As it turns out, there are ways you can use data to your advantage, even if you’re not a math wizard. market volatility. I’m Barry Ritholtz.
We’d have to tax ~85% of imports to cover that, but that would also reduce imports so it’s unrealistic and the basic math doesn’t come close to working. A 60/40 portfolio is a 12 year instrument in my methodology. CR: The govt makes $2.5T from the income tax and the US imports $3T of goods.
You might have a generic 60/40 portfolio that you expected to cover the rest of your income needs but that possibly needs updating after recent market activity. 3] So, it’s easy math: the less you work, the less you’ll earn. Regardless, Social Security can provide a helping hand with your income.
If you will pull an income from an investment portfolio, what could go wrong? If that money is in an IRA, that is going to change your math considerably due to having to withdraw all of that inherited IRA within 10 years. Lousy longer term returns could be a problem as could some sort of mistake.
Her job is portfolio and product solutions and that means she could go anywhere in the world and do anything. One, one is true and I’ve always said is that I wanted people to stop, ask if I could doing math. And no one asked me if I can do math anymore with a degree from Booth, particularly in econometrics and statistics.
The way the math works, a 67% allocation to NTSX (Portfolio 2 with 33% in the T-bill ETF) equals 100% in Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBAIX) which is a proxy for 60/40 and Portfolio 3. Portfolio 1 is 100% in NTSX which in 2022 was down 25.84% versus down 16.85% for Portfolio 2 and 16.87% for Portfolio 3.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content