This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Traditional portfoliomanagement applies allocation models that account for risk per unit of return, but fail to account for the problem of time within this process. The All Duration Investing approach adds the element of time by quantifying a portfolio for returns per unit of risk across time.
As with many things in life, the truth is somewhere between the extremes: While both simulated and real-world data suggest momentum may not be suitable as a driver of long-term asset allocations, we believe momentum considerations can be integrated in a cost-effective way to help inform daily portfoliomanagement decisions.
This assertion is open to debate and in fact has been refuted by various studies, but it gives some investors pause when considering active managers for their portfolios. Over longer periods, we think active management can add alpha, even in more efficient asset classes.
This assertion is open to debate and in fact has been refuted by various studies, but it gives some investors pause when considering active managers for their portfolios. Manager Characteristics. Over longer periods, we think active management can add alpha, even in more efficient asset classes.
Macchia mentions that there are firms that have sprung up offering no load products, products that report into your portfoliomanagement system, wrap-able products, etc. That lead him to start Quest Asset Management, with the novel idea of putting investor interests first as a fiduciary, which was practically unheard of at the time.
00:19:11 [Speaker Changed] The, the challenge is always the transition from the uptrend to the downtrend, which is why you have portfoliomanagers and allocators arguing who’s responsible. Alternatives and alternative strategies tend to be less tax efficient, more opaque. 00:48:46 [Speaker Changed] Absolutely.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content